UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (17) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: TheSteelyDan Big gold star, 5000 posts Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 9924  
Subject: Re: The last Encyclopædia Britannica Date: 15/03/2012 18:05
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 1
The one thing that will be really missing, though, is the diversity of learning that a printed encyclopaedia can generate. While an online encyclopaedia will allow you to follow a web of links related to a subject, you won't go on to the next, unrelated article, and you won't have your eye caught by an unrelated picture.

Wikipedia has a "Random Article" link, which is a good way of wasting ten minutes (or more).

I like to play "Wikington Crescent": Click on Random Article, and see how few clicks it takes you to get to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mornington_Crescent_tube_statio.... Of course, there are quite a few more rules, but I'm sure I don't need to tell you what they are ...
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (17) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next

Announcements

The Book Club board
Read & review a book every month. (And quite unlike the C4 series of the same name!)
Free investing reports you can download right now
Pick and choose from several free Motley Fool reports.