Maybe we should give Luni some slack and let him include whichever company he wants to include in his extremely useful posts.

I wasn't trying to give Luni a hard time but rather ask why he included such a small company when the general counsel here is to avoid very small cap shares for HYP's.

Having said that, I'd actually prefer to see all good dividend candidates, particularly those with good dividend growth records, no matter what size they are. So I also wonder whether Luni applies his search criteria to all such possible candidates, or whether Alumasc slipped through the filter by accident?

I think we're mostly all familiar with "the usual HYP suspects" so I find research on the smaller companies actually more useful.