The 10 Most Recommended Messages By TMFTarantula
Take me
back to where I was.
-
Date: 15/6/09 10:01
-
Number: 122091
-
Recommendations: 189
Hi CityTTrader / Paul 20p by Friday
I recently responded to a discussion very similar to this and was promptly blocked by TMF. I think that statement needs clarification, lest anyone think you were hard done
(Continued...)
-
Date: 2/4/09 09:52
-
Number: 3896
-
Recommendations: 152
As some eagle-eyed Fools have already noticed, the Motley Fool logo has changed - reverted, in fact - to saying "To Educate, Amuse & Enrich". At the same time, the layout & design of the home page has changed.
Both are
(Continued...)
-
Date: 12/12/06 15:04
-
Number: 156061
-
Recommendations: 140
Hi BK
Could you please tell us why you've censored my post that Kong replied to here A 'deleted message notice' email, containing an explanation, was sent to your registered address, as per usual, so I'm not sure why there was
(Continued...)
-
Date: 16/12/07 22:46
-
Number: 7622
-
Recommendations: 117
EE just announced over on ADVFN that he's been banned. I cannot think of hardly any contributor (1 or 2 perhaps) whose posts I value above his. Particularly in a critical week for oil investments for investors of many stocks, including SOCO, it's
(Continued...)
-
Date: 16/5/08 10:03
-
Number: 222658
-
Recommendations: 104
A little earlier this morning we removed a thread started by Calcaria - with the subject line "Mervyn King: Mortgage rates at eight-year high" - which involved removing replies by, amongst others, grumpygit.
Following that
(Continued...)
-
Date: 21/2/12 13:50
-
Number: 27453
-
Recommendations: 101
Hi Eaglei27
I'm sure it's just a coincidence that you appear to have posted your generally favourable comments from a computer on a network in the same building as Emerald Knight's London office.
Foolish regards
Tarantula
-
Date: 5/6/05 12:13
-
Number: 70571
-
Recommendations: 83
-
Date: 7/10/05 23:51
-
Number: 75759
-
Recommendations: 82
Hi everyone
Thanks to everyone who reported the recent spate of disruptive posts.
Should any more appear, please could I ask everyone to
resist the (understandable) temptation to reply to such posts. The best approach is simply
(Continued...)
-
Date: 20/2/03 15:43
-
Number: 18331
-
Recommendations: 81
Hi everyone,
We've just removed a long thread about asylum seekers from the Pub board.
Given the overwhelmingly clear result of Paulypilot's recent poll - in which
206 people voted for
less political discussion on this
(Continued...)
-
Date: 27/4/08 16:44
-
Number: 108285
-
Recommendations: 75
Hi all
Just a note on 'civil discussion'.
CockneyRebel, you wrote:
And I'm not here to pick a fight with BertE as much as he might like to turn it to look that way...By far the best way for it
(Continued...)
Total = 10Take me
back to where I was.